![]() ![]() What has happened over the years is that hopes to find a unified theory using one of those limiting cases have collapsed as it became clear this didn’t work. String theory has always suffered from the fact that it is only defined in certain limiting cases. I heard you say in a recent podcast interview that it’s hard to pin down what String Theory even is today. In recent years they themselves have mostly given up on their original claims and the field has come to a standstill, so no reason to spend much time on it. Back when I wrote the book I was concentrating on trying to understand exactly what string theorists were doing. I think that the arguments made in that book have aged very well and there is little that I would change if I were to rewrite it today. Has anything has changed since then about the way you think about String Theory? SUGGESTED READING We still don't understand the measurement problem By Sabine Hossenfelder In either case, the idea of string theory unification is simply a failure. There is an essentially infinite number of ways to do this (the "landscape"), giving almost anything you want, so unpredictive. ![]() The initial hope of 1984-5 was that there would only be a few consistent ways of making those extra dimensions unobservably small, and one of these would give our universe. The main problem with the theory though has always been a simple one: it achieves unification by postulating six or seven unobserved extra dimensions, then tries to explain everything we see in terms of these. The story of string theory is rather complicated, so the intent of the book was to fully examine some of those complexities. Could you summarise the main argument against String Theory as put forward in that book? ![]() Your book Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Continuing challenge to Unify the Laws of Physics came out in 2006. Even the remaining string theorists of the past have given up on the ontology of strings, as well as the original vision of the theory. He argues that String Theory has become a degenerative research project, becoming increasingly complicated and, at the same time, removed from empirical reality. Following Eric Weinstein’s interview on how String Theory culture has stifled innovation in theoretical physics, longstanding critic of String Theory, Peter Woit, takes aim at the theory itself. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |